Event Reliability¶
Executive Summary¶
Event Reliability defines reliability expectations for Algosure event publishing and consumption. It covers outbox alignment, idempotent consumers, retry rules, dead-letter handling, failure visibility, and event replay as a future capability.
Why This Exists¶
Event-driven architecture fails when events are lost, duplicated, silently ignored, or replayed unsafely. Algosure requires predictable event behavior across Domains, AIOS, notifications, analytics, integrations, and audit.
Owner¶
The owner is the Chief Product Officer and Enterprise Architect.
Business Value¶
Reliable events support trustworthy workflows, recoverable failures, operational insight, and future scaling.
Reliability Model¶
flowchart LR
Publisher[Publisher]
Outbox[Outbox]
Delivery[Event Delivery]
Consumer[Consumer]
Retry[Retry]
DeadLetter[Dead-Letter Handling]
Audit[Audit Trail]
Publisher --> Outbox
Outbox --> Delivery
Delivery --> Consumer
Consumer -->|temporary failure| Retry
Retry --> Consumer
Consumer -->|terminal failure| DeadLetter
Delivery --> Audit
DeadLetter --> Audit
Reliability Rules¶
| Rule | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Use outbox for important events | Events that coordinate processes, audit, integrations, analytics, notifications, or AIOS should be captured reliably. |
| Consumers are idempotent | Duplicate event delivery must be safe. |
| Retries are bounded and visible | Retry attempts must be observable and should not run forever without escalation. |
| Dead-letter handling is required | Events that cannot be processed after retry policy must be parked for review. |
| Failures are auditable | Publication and consumption failures must be traceable. |
| Replay is future capability | Event replay should be supported by preserving event identity, version, metadata, and ordering assumptions. |
Retry Rules¶
| Failure Type | Architecture Response |
|---|---|
| Temporary dependency failure | Retry with bounded policy and operational visibility. |
| Consumer validation failure | Do not retry blindly; park or reject according to error classification. |
| Unsupported event version | Park for compatibility review or route to version-specific handler. |
| Tenant authorization failure | Stop processing and create audit evidence. |
| Duplicate event | Ignore or merge idempotently. |
| Poison event | Move to dead-letter handling with reason and owner. |
Dead-Letter Handling¶
Dead-letter handling is a governed operational state for events that cannot be processed safely.
| Requirement | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Preserve original event | Keep event ID, metadata, payload reference, and failure reason. |
| Assign owner | Source or consuming module ownership must be clear. |
| Support review | Operations and architecture must be able to inspect failure cause. |
| Support replay or discard decision | Dead-letter events require explicit resolution. |
| Protect tenant data | Review access must follow tenant and security controls. |
Non-Implementation Boundary¶
This document does not define retry intervals, dead-letter queue products, broker configuration, outbox schema, scheduler implementation, or replay tooling.