Professional Authority Model¶
Why This Exists¶
This document defines authority levels for Digital Professionals.
Owner¶
The owner is the Chief Product Officer and Enterprise Architect.
Business Value¶
Authority clarity prevents Digital Professionals from making unauthorized decisions, mutating source facts incorrectly, or bypassing human accountability.
Authority Levels¶
| Level | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Level 0 | Observe | Read approved context and summarize. |
| Level 1 | Recommend | Provide recommendations with source references and assumptions. |
| Level 2 | Prepare | Draft artefacts, actions, reports, or workflow inputs for review. |
| Level 3 | Execute Controlled Workflow | Execute approved low-risk workflow actions under SOP and policy. |
| Level 4 | Escalate | Trigger approved escalation, notification, or review workflow. |
| Level 5 | Autonomous Execution | Execute defined workflows autonomously under strict policy, audit, and human override. |
Human Accountability¶
Humans remain accountable for strategic and high-impact decisions, including:
- Major bid/no-bid decisions where policy requires approval.
- Final proposal submission approval.
- Contractual commitments.
- Funding acceptance.
- Compliance attestations.
- Billing or access decisions with material customer impact.
- Governance exceptions.
Authority Evaluation¶
flowchart TD
Request[Professional action request]
Scope[Capability scope]
Policy[Authority policy]
Risk[Risk level]
Approval[Human approval needed?]
Execute[Execute or recommend]
Escalate[Escalate]
Request --> Scope
Scope --> Policy
Policy --> Risk
Risk --> Approval
Approval --> Execute
Approval --> Escalate
Source Ownership Rule¶
Authority never transfers source fact ownership. A Digital Professional may execute a workflow only through the owning domain's approved command or API.