Professional Performance Review¶
Why This Exists¶
This document defines how Digital Professional performance is reviewed.
Owner¶
The owner is the Chief Product Officer and Enterprise Architect.
Business Value¶
Performance review ensures Digital Professionals improve business outcomes, stay within guardrails, and remain aligned to Practice performance.
Review Inputs¶
| Input | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Practice KPIs | Measure business outcome contribution. |
| Workflow records | Measure execution quality and timeliness. |
| Handoff feedback | Measure collaboration quality. |
| Guardrail events | Measure safety and compliance. |
| Human review feedback | Capture expert and customer review. |
| Analytics insights | Identify patterns and improvement opportunities. |
Review Cadence¶
| Cadence | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Operational review | Review active workflow quality and blockers. |
| Monthly review | Review KPI performance and guardrail adherence. |
| Quarterly review | Review authority, tool access, memory rules, and maturity. |
| Incident review | Review failures, unsafe behavior, or major quality issues. |
Review Flow¶
flowchart LR
Measure[Measure]
Review[Review]
Improve[Improve]
Validate[Validate]
Govern[Govern]
Measure --> Review
Review --> Improve
Improve --> Validate
Validate --> Govern
Govern --> Measure
Review Outcomes¶
Performance review may result in prompt updates, SOP updates, tool permission changes, authority changes, memory rule changes, KPI changes, additional human review, or temporary rollback to lower autonomy.